2024 : 11 : 24
Kamran Chapi

Kamran Chapi

Academic rank: Associate Professor
ORCID:
Education: PhD.
ScopusId: 55345306000
HIndex:
Faculty: Faculty of Natural Resources
Address: Department of Nature Reources Rehabilitation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Pasdaran Blvd., Sanandaj, Kurdistan Province, IR Iran, POB 416, Postal Code 6617715175
Phone: +98-8733627721 Ext. 4321

Research

Title
A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran
Type
JournalPaper
Keywords
Alternating Decision Trees; Flood susceptibility assessment; Logistic Model Trees; Machine learning; Naïve Bayes Trees; Reduced Error Pruning Trees
Year
2018
Journal SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
DOI
Researchers Khabat Khosravi ، Binh Thai Pham ، Kamran Chapi ، Ataollah Shirzadi ، Himan Shahabi ، Inge Revhaug ، Indra Prakash ، DieuTien Bui

Abstract

Floods are one of the most damaging natural hazards causing huge loss of property, infrastructure and lives. Prediction of occurrence of flash flood locations is very difficult due to sudden change in climatic condition and manmade factors. However, prior identification of flood susceptible areas can be done with the help of machine learning techniques for proper timely management of flood hazards. In this study, we tested four decision trees based machine learning models namely Logistic Model Trees (LMT), Reduced Error Pruning Trees (REPT), Naïve Bayes Trees (NBT), and Alternating Decision Trees (ADT) for flash flood susceptibility mapping at the Haraz Watershed in the northern part of Iran. For this, a spatial database was constructed with 201 present and past flood locations and eleven flood-influencing factors namely ground slope, altitude, curvature, Stream Power Index (SPI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), land use, rainfall, river density, distance from river, lithology, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Statistical evaluation measures, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and Freidman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to validate and compare the prediction capability of the models. Results show that the ADT model has the highest prediction capability for flash flood susceptibility assessment, followed by the NBT, the LMT, and the REPT, respectively. These techniques have proven successful in quickly determining flood susceptible areas.