2024 : 11 : 21
Heidar Piri

Heidar Piri

Academic rank: Assistant Professor
ORCID: 0000-0002-4302-7938
Education: PhD.
ScopusId: 8976
HIndex:
Faculty: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Address:
Phone:

Research

Title
Implementation of Transitional Justice Mechanisms in the 1987-1988 Kurdish Genocide in Iraq
Type
Presentation
Keywords
Kurd, Kurdistan, Transitional justice, Genocide, International responsibility of the State, Iraq.
Year
2024
Researchers Heidar Piri

Abstract

During 1987 and 1988, the Iraqi state carried out airstrikes and chemical bombardments in eight stages in different Kurdish regions of Iraq, including the city of Halabja as a part of an operation called Anfal . The operations were committed by the Ba'ath regime institutions, in particular the secret police, the intelligence, the Jiang Hanen, the Amn Al’am, and others. The Anfal genocide indicates the Ba'athis’s intentional end to destroy Kurdish villagers and their farms, and in fact to destroy and eradicate the Kurdish population, as a result of which almost 182,000 people were killed. These attacks, aimed at destroying the Kurdish ethnic group in Iraq, are a clear indication of genocide. Therefore, the present paper will address the mechanisms of transitional justice in the genocide in Iraqi Kurdistan. In this respect, the paper will try to answer this question that in view of the international responsibility of the Iraqi state, what would be the proper mechanisms for achieving peace, reconciliation and healing of the victims’ sufferings of the crimes committed in Kurdistan? The main argument is that the issue of dealing with serious and organized human rights violations against the Kurds in the Iraqi transitional society is not a simple issue that can be resolved only through one mechanism. Therefore, transitional justice in the Iraq genocide requires multiple mechanisms. A Comprehensive approach and flexible cooperation of all mechanisms is a promising version of legal pluralism which is essential for the rule of law; as the experience of transitional justice programs show that a unified approach to transitional justice is not only dissatisfactory but also rather not self-sustaining for the establishment of justice.