2024 : 11 : 21
Eisa Maroufpoor

Eisa Maroufpoor

Academic rank: Professor
ORCID:
Education: PhD.
ScopusId: 36682969100
HIndex:
Faculty: Faculty of Agriculture
Address: Department of Water Engineering, University of Kurdistan Sanandaj,Iran PoBOX: 416 Tel: 871 6627722-25 ext. 320 Fax: 871 6620550
Phone: 08733620552

Research

Title
Artificial Intelligence Approach to Estimate Discharge of Drip Tape Irrigation based on Temperature and Pressure
Type
JournalPaper
Keywords
Artificial Neural Network, Drip Irrigation, k-Fold Testing, Neuro-Fuzzy, Support Vector Machine
Year
2019
Journal AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
DOI
Researchers Amin Seyedzadeh ، Saman Marouf pour ، Eisa Maroufpoor ، Jalal Shiri ، Omid Bozorg-Haddad ، Farnosh gavazi

Abstract

One of the effective factors to ensure the desirable operation of drip irrigation systems is the uniform emitter discharge, which is affected by operating pressure and temperature. Accurate estimation of this parameter is crucial for optimal irrigation system management and operation. In this research, the emitter outflow discharge was simulated through artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches under a wide range of temperature (13-53 °C) and operating pressures (0-240 kPa) variations. The applied AI models included artificial neural networks (ANN), neuro-fuzzy sub-clustering (NF-SC), neuro-fuzzy c-Means clustering (NF-FCM), and least square support vector machine (LS-SVM). The input parameters matrix consisted of operating pressure, water temperature, discharge coefficient, pressure exponent and nominal discharge, while the ratio of measured discharge to nominal discharge (modified coefficient, M) was the output of the models. The applied models were assessed through the robust k-fold testing data scanning mode. The 5-agent Global Performance Indicator (GPI) was used for the final reliable ranking. The results showed that all the applied AI models with an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.8% had acceptable accuracy for estimating the modified M coefficient. According to the GPI, the LS-SVM model had the lowest error, followed by the NF-SC model with a slight difference.