2024 : 5 : 5
Mehdi Irani

Mehdi Irani

Academic rank: Associate Professor
ORCID:
Education: PhD.
ScopusId: 25630519900
Faculty: Faculty of Science
Address: University Of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, P. O. Box: 416, Iran
Phone: +989128018046

Research

Title
Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Study of the Reaction Mechanism of Glyoxalase I
Type
JournalPaper
Keywords
Glyoxalase I, unusual specificity, reaction mechanism, QM/MM, DFT, enatioselectivity, enzyme
Year
2020
Journal INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
DOI
Researchers Sonia Jafari ، Ulf Ryde ، Adam Fouda ، Fatemeh Sadat Alavi ، Geng Dong ، Mehdi Irani

Abstract

Glyoxalase I (GlxI) is a member of the glyoxalase system, which is important in cell detoxification and converts hemithioacetals of methylglyoxal (a cytotoxic byproduct of sugar metabolism that may react with DNA or proteins and introduce nucleic acid strand breaks, elevated mutation frequencies, and structural or functional changes of the proteins) and glutathione into d-lactate. GlxI accepts both the S and R enantiomers of hemithioacetal, but converts them to only the S-d enantiomer of lactoylglutathione. Interestingly, the enzyme shows this unusual specificity with a rather symmetric active site (a Zn ion coordinated to two glutamate residues; Glu-99 and Glu-172), making the investigation of its reaction mechanism challenging. Herein, we have performed a series of combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics calculations to study the reaction mechanism of GlxI. The substrate can bind to the enzyme in two different modes, depending on the direction of its alcoholic proton (H2; toward Glu-99 or Glu-172). Our results show that the S substrate can react only if H2 is directed toward Glu-99 and the R substrate only if H2 is directed toward Glu-172. In both cases, the reactions lead to the experimentally observed S-d enantiomer of the product. In addition, the results do not show any low-energy paths to the wrong enantiomer of the product from neither the S nor the R substrate. Previous studies have presented several opposing mechanisms for the conversion of R and S enantiomers of the substrate to the correct enantiomer of the product. Our results confirm one of them for the S substrate, but propose a new one for the R substrate.