The authors appreciate the discussers for their interesting comments, which have been addressed as follows. 1) First, it is noteworthy that the mentioned work [1] addresses the secondary frequency control problem in a microgrid, and secondary frequency control is mainly known as a performance optimization control problem rather than a stabilizing control issue [2]. Then, as emphasized in our paper, the proposed frequency controller could be practically robust in the presence of all disturbances that affect the balance between system load and generation in a specified operation range. Therefore, the developed controller is responsible to cover those faults and events that impact load and/or generation side and hence make frequency deviation in a predetermined rage. The frequency deviations lower than the mentioned rage are automatically compensated by the primary frequency control loops of the individual …
